SCCL Disclaimer for Continuing Education Courses & Related Content

The Saskatoon Colostrum Company Ltd.’s (“SCCL”) Continuing Education Courses (the “Courses”), and all related informational material and content including, without limitation, SCCL’s e-newsletter and display pages (“Related Content”) which appear on www.sccl.com or any of its subdomains or are otherwise provided to users, are provided on an “AS IS” basis and are intended for general consumer understanding and education only. Any access to the Courses or Related Content is voluntary and at the sole risk of the user. SCCL makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the Courses or Related Content. If the user is dissatisfied with the Courses or Related Content, the user’s sole and exclusive remedy is to discontinue using the Courses and site. Nothing contained in the Courses or Related Content should be considered, or used as a substitute for, veterinary medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. The information provided on the website is for educational and informational purposes only and is not meant as a substitute for professional advice from a veterinarian or other professional. Courses and Related Content are designed to educate consumers on general colostrum benefits that may affect their animal’s daily lives. This site and its Courses do not constitute the practice of any veterinary medical or other professional veterinary health care advice, diagnosis or treatment. SCCL disclaims liability for any damages or losses, direct or indirect, that may result from use of or reliance on information contained within the Courses or Related Content. Although access to the Courses and Related Content is open to worldwide users, SCCL is organized under the laws of Canada. Therefore, the terms of this disclaimer shall be governed by the laws of Saskatchewan, Canada as to the interpretation, validity and effect of this disclaimer notwithstanding and without giving effect to any conflict of laws provisions of your domicile, residence or physical location. You agree to submit to the jurisdiction of Saskatchewan. SCCL advises consumers to always seek the advice of a veterinarian, veterinary specialist or other qualified veterinary health care provider with any questions regarding an animal’s health or medical conditions. Never disregard, avoid or delay in obtaining medical advice from your veterinarian or other qualified veterinary health care provider because of something you have read on this site.

The Colostrum Counsel – 7 Things To Have In Stock This Calving Season: A Veterinarian-Approved Checklist

The first 24 hours of a calf’s life are the most critical. As we prepare for calving, taking inventory of the tools that need to be on hand should be top of mind before the first calf hits the ground. Make sure everything goes smooth this calving season by being prepared with our veterinarian-approved checklist.

Click to Download the Printable PDF for your Barn!
  1. Vet Contact Information:
    • Add this number to your favourites list! Make sure they can be called as soon as possible if things so sideways.
    • * Calving Pro Tip *
      • Post the name and number of your vet on the fridge in the calving barn alongside your address or land location so anyone can acquire help during an emergency.
  2. Post Calving Protocol:
    • Talk to your vet before calving and develop a plan to deliver essential vaccines, vitamins, minerals or medications that should be given immediately post-calving or may be needed in the busy weeks to come.
    • Ensure consistent calf care. Be sure that any decided protocols including dosages, and medication/vitamin/vaccine names are clearly displayed for you and any staff or calving help.
  3. Supplies to Assist Calving:
    • Calving can turn into an emergency situation quickly and you don’t want to be caught searching the barn looking for key materials when crucial time is passing. Be sure you have these essential items on hand, cleaned, disinfected, and ready to go:
      – Clean bucket
      – Disinfectant (Chlorhexidine is recommended)
      – Chains and handles
      – Calf jack
      – 7% iodine for dipping navels
      – Lubricant (high quality, water-based)
      – Palpation (obstetrics or OB) sleeves and latex exam gloves
  4. Calf Tagging Supplies:
    • This includes tags, a calf tagger, and tag marker or maker. Make sure you have all the tags you’ll need for calving season on-hand.
  5. Record Keeping Supplies:
    • Whether you use a calving book or input records online be sure you have the tools needed to keep good and accurate records throughout the calving season.
    • Recommended records to keep:
      • Calf sex, dam, birth date, birth weight, calving score in addition to any other record important to track to understand and achieve the goals of your operation.
    • * Calving Pro Tip *
      • Keep records of sick animals, the date, what drug was administered, if a second dose is needed and if there are any withdrawal times. Keep track of second or repeat doses on your calendar and make sure you and whoever else is responsible for treating calves understand the system so calves aren’t treated twice or not at all!
  6. Good Quality Colostrum:
    • It is a non-negotiable – calves NEED good quality and adequate colostrum as soon as possible. Sometimes this means human intervention. There is no such thing as feeding colostrum too early.
    • While straight from the dam is always best, if mom is dry and you don’t have any in stock, having SCCL (a 100% whole bovine colostrum replacement) allows timely colostrum feeding. This ensures that not matter the circumstances calves get the immunity they need to reach their potential and support your operation’s goals. Make sure you have enough to supplement at least 10% of the herd.
    • * Calving Pro Tip *
      • When re-heating colostrum NEVER microwave it. Allow colostrum to warm in a hot water bath to 110-120°F (43-49°C). When preparing a powdered supplement or replacement, use water that is already warmed to the appropriate temperature. Higher heat and microwaves denature the essential proteins (IgGs) that provide protective immunity to newborn calves.
  7. Bottles, Nipples, Tube Feeder:
    • This is important to get fluids in calves whether that be colostrum. electrolytes, or milk replacer.
    • Disinfect between uses.
    • When it comes to tube feeders – plastic tubes offer more flexibility and reduce the chances of injuring the calf. However, they are more prone to damage, make sure you’re replacing them whenever you start to notice scarring in the tubing as this can be a breeding ground for bacteria.
    • * Calving Pro Tip *
      • Have at least 2 sets of bottles/nipples and tube feeders. One for healthy calves and another for sick calves to avoid cross contamination. You’d hate to expose a healthy newborn calf who just needs a boost of colostrum to the pathogens from a couple week old scouring calf that needed electrolytes earlier that day.

 

Download the Printable PDF Checklist!

The Colostrum Counsel – Mental Health & Calf Health: A Good Start Builds a Strong Future

Introduction

October marks International Mental Health Awareness Month. Across the globe, farmers face mounting pressures: economic uncertainty, climate variability, trade disruptions, and the emotional toll of caring for land and livestock. Organizations like The Do More Agriculture Foundation are leading the way in breaking the stigma around mental health in agriculture, offering tools like AgTalk and #TalkItOutTag to foster connection and resilience. 

But mental health isn’t just about responding to crisis, it’s also about preventing stress before it starts. And that principle applies just as powerfully to calf health.

Colostrum: The First Step Toward a Resilient Herd

Colostrum management is one of the most critical interventions in a calf’s life. The first feeding, ideally within the first 2 hours after birth, delivers essential immunoglobulins (IgG), nutrients, and energy that protect the calf from disease and support early development (Arnold, 2014; USDA APHIS, 2021). Research shows that calves who receive adequate, high-quality colostrum are:

  • Less likely to suffer from scours and respiratory illness
  • More likely to thrive and reach growth milestones
  • Less likely to require costly treatments or rearing interventions
  • More likely to become productive members of the herd (Lactanet, 2025; Dean et al., 2025)

Healthy Calves Means Healthier Farmers

When calves start strong, farmers experience fewer setbacks, less stress, and greater confidence in their herd’s future. Good colostrum management reduces the emotional and financial strain of dealing with sick animals and that’s a form of mental health support too!

Whether you’re in North America or anywhere else in the world, the message is the same: Investing in early care leads to long-term resilience.

So this October, as we talk openly about mental health in agriculture, let’s also talk about the power of prevention, in our communities and in our calf pens. A healthy start with colostrum is a step toward a healthier future, for your herd and for you.

The Colostrum Counsel – Colostrum Beyond the First Feeding: Supporting Calves Through Diarrhea

Introduction

As the dairy industry continues to evolve under the pressure of antimicrobial resistance, producers are seeking alternatives to traditional antibiotic therapies, especially for common calfhood diseases like diarrhea. One promising solution is colostrum, not just as a preventive measure, but as an intervention during cases of diarrhea.

Diarrhea remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in preweaned calves, often triggered by a complex interplay of environmental, management, and pathogenic factors.

While prevention is paramount, ensuring adequate colostrum intake at birth, maintaining hygiene, and minimizing stress, supportive therapy is critical when diarrhea does occur.

Colostrum as a Supportive Therapy: Evidence from Research

A study conducted at a commercial calf-raising facility in Southwestern Ontario (Carter et al., 2021) evaluated the effect of colostrum supplementation, provided at the onset of diarrhea, on calf health outcomes. Calves were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups:

  • Control (CON): Milk replacer only
  • Short-Term Colostrum (STC): Colostrum-milk blend for 4 feedings over 2 days, followed by milk replacer
  • Long-Term Colostrum (LTC): Colostrum-milk blend for 8 feedings over 4 days

Calves in the LTC group showed clear benefits compared to CON, including:

  • Diarrhea resolved 2 times faster
  • Improved average daily gain (+98 g/day)
  • Significantly larger body weights on days 42 (+4 kg) and 56 (+ 6 kg) post-enrollment

These findings support the therapeutic use of colostrum beyond the first feeding.

Its rich supply of antibodies, growth factors, nutrients, and antibacterial activity helps repair intestinal damage, support immune function, and restore gut health, without disrupting microbial diversity like antibiotics often do (Carter et. al, 2021).

Why Antibiotics Aren’t Always the Answer

Because the most common causes of calf diarrhea are viral or parasitics, antibiotics can be ineffective, and their use can negatively impact the calf’s gut microbiome.

Studies have shown that antimicrobial use can reduce microbial diversity and impair immune development (Urie et al., 2018; Oultram et al., 2015). Instead, effective management should prioritize fluid therapy as the cornerstone of treatment to prevent dehydration and support recovery.

Alongside fluids, colostrum offers a natural option that can aid recovery without compromising long-term gut health.

Key Takeaways

  • Prevention is still the foundation: Ensure excellent passive transfer (≥ 300 g IgG within 8 hours of birth) and maintain clean, stress-free environments.
  • Supportive care is essential: Isolate sick calves, hydrate, and respond quickly to symptoms.
  • Colostrum is a versatile tool: Use it not only at birth, but also as a supportive agent during diarrhea episodes.
  • Consult your veterinarian: Professional guidance ensures safe and effective treatment.

Colostrum is more than a first feed, it’s a powerful, science-backed therapy that can transform how we manage calf diarrhea.

By integrating colostrum into both preventive and therapeutic protocols, producers can reduce reliance on antibiotics, improve calf outcomes, and support a healthier, more sustainable future for dairy operations.

 

Please download full PDF for references. 

The Colostrum Counsel – Restoring Gut Health in Calves: The Key Role of Colostrum During Times of Stress

Introduction

Summer stressors like heat, flies, transport, and dietary changes can quickly disrupt the health of preweaned calves. Diarrhea and dehydration are common consequences, often requiring immediate intervention. In these moments, producers need a fast, effective solution to restore gut health and support recovery. That’s where the RESTORE protocol comes in.

Heat Stress: A Hidden Threat to Calf Health
While the impact of summer heat on lactating cows is well known, its effect on calves is often underestimated. Calves exposed to high temperatures experience:
  • Reduced feed intake and growth due to increased energy demands for cooling (Bateman, 2012)
  • Elevated cortisol levels, which impair immune function and reduce immunoglobulin absorption
  • Failure of passive transfer (FPT), as heat-stressed cows produce lower-quality colostrum and calves absorb less of it (Hill et al., 2012)

In hot environments, especially in poorly ventilated hutches, calves are more prone to diarrhea, dehydration, and long-term productivity losses. These conditions make rapid gut recovery essential.

Why RESTORE?

Unlike transition feeding, which is preventative, the RESTORE protocol is a short-term therapeutic strategy designed for calves that are already sick. It uses whole bovine colostrum to rebuild the gut lining, restore normal stool, and support immune function, all within a 3–5 day feeding window. Colostrum is uniquely suited for this role. It contains:

  • Immunoglobulins that support local immunity in the gastrointestinal tract
  • Colostral fat for energy and resilience
  • Vitamins A, D, E, and K, plus essential minerals
  • Growth factors and oligosaccharides that promote intestinal repair and microbial balance

These components work together to help calves recover faster and reduce the need for antimicrobial treatments.

Evidence from the Field

A study conducted at a commercial calf-raising facility in Ontario (Carter et al., 2021) evaluated colostrum supplementation as a therapy for diarrhea. Calves receiving long-term colostrum supplementation (LTC) showed:

  • Faster resolution of diarrhea
  • Improved average daily gain (+98 g/day)
  • Reduced severity of symptoms

These results highlight the effectiveness of colostrum not just in prevention, but in active recovery during stress events.

RESTORE Feeding Protocol

To implement RESTORE:

  • Mix 140 g of colostrum powder with 1 qt/L of water
  • Feed for 3–5 days, or until stool normalizes
  • Administer at least 2 hours before or after milk feeding
  • If calves lack appetite, the solution can be tube-fed

This protocol is simple, fast, and backed by research making it ideal for producers facing urgent health challenges in their herds.

Conclusion

When calves face stress, their gut health is often the first to suffer. The RESTORE protocol offers a natural, science-based solution to help calves recover quickly and thrive. As summer conditions continue to challenge young animals, colostrum remains one of the most powerful tools producers can use to protect and restore calf health.

_

For references, please refer to PDF version by clicking “Download this article”

The Colostrum Counsel – Unlocking the Power of Transition Milk: Evidence and Application

Introduction

The importance of colostrum within the first hours of a calf’s life is universally recognized, as newborn calves are born with a naive immune system and are entirely dependent on colostrum to acquire passive immunity. Traditionally, this feeding is limited to a single dose of high-quality (> 50g/L of IgG) colostrum within the first hours post-birth. However, new evidence suggests that extending colostrum feeding using transition milk (TM), defined as milkings 2 through 6 post-calving (Godden, 2008), can provide significant health and performance benefits to young calves during the critical early weeks of life.

Transition milk maintains many of the nutritional and immunological benefits of colostrum in a lower concentration, including elevated concentrations of fat, protein, immunoglobulins, growth factors, hormones, and oligosaccharides, all of which are present at levels far above those found in mature milk(Fischer-Tlustos et al., 2020). These bioactive compounds contribute to gut development, microbiome establishment, immune maturation, and metabolic stability, especially during the first month, when calves are most vulnerable to disease and environmental stressors (Quigley & Drewry, 1998).

A growing number of studies have shown that extended colostrum or TM feeding improves average daily gain (ADG), reduces respiratory and digestive disease, and lowers calf mortality and antimicrobial use (Berge et al., 2009; Chamorro et al., 2017; Kargar et al., 2020; Cantor et al., 2021). Feeding enriched liquid diets for 4 to 14 days post-birth has been associated with improved long-term performance, although results vary depending on formulation and protocol (Van Soest et al., 2020). Additionally, colostral antibodies that remain in the gut lumen beyond the absorptive window may still provide local immune protection, contributing to reduced enteric infections and improved villus development (Hare et al., 2020).

McCarthy et al. (2023) demonstrated that supplementing milk replacer with colostrum replacer improved ADG and reduced the hazard of diarrhea and mortality during the preweaning period. These findings suggest that transition milk strategies are effective, underutilized tools for supporting calves during high-risk periods such as disease challenges, vaccination, dehorning, and weaning.

Carter et al (2022) investigated the use of bovine colostrum as a therapeutic intervention for diarrhea. A total of 108 calves at a commercial calf-raising facility in Canada were enrolled upon diagnosis of diarrhea and randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (1) control, (2) short-term colostrum supplementation for2 days following diarrhea onset (50% MR + 50% CR), or (3) long-term colostrum supplementation for 4 days following diarrhea onset (50% MR + 50% CR). Calves in the long-term group experienced faster resolution of diarrhea and grew, on average, 98 g/day more over a 56-day period compared to the control group. These findings support the use of colostrum supplementation as a non-antibiotic strategy for managing calf diarrhea, with positive impacts on both health and growth performance.

The Practical Trial: Koepon Dairy Farm

To test this concept under commercial farm conditions, a practical field trial was conducted at Koepon dairy farm, by student researcher Ruth Huinder, in collaboration with colostrum specialist Dr. Juliana Mergh Leao and Dr. Dave Renaud, Professor at the University of Guelph.

Study Design

Twenty female Holstein calves were enrolled and randomly assigned to a control or test group. All calves received two initial (4L + 2 L) feedings of high-quality maternal colostrum (> 25% Brix) and were fed maternal transition milk on days 2 and 3, followed by milk replacer. The test group (EXT), however, received an additional supplement of SCCL colostrum replacer: 70 g of colostrum powder (CCT 14% IgG) mixed with 140 ml of water (mixed at temperature 43-49°C and fed at body temperature), providing 420 ml per day (divide into two feedings), administered daily from day 4 through day 14.

Calves were monitored for weight gain and health scores over a six-week period, including evaluations for fecal consistency, respiratory status, and general condition.

Results

  • The test group (EXT) achieved a numerically higher average daily gain of 135g/d when compared to the control group on the first 3 weeks. Overall growth was +35g/d during the first 6 weeks of life

 

Table 1. Weights of the test (EXT) – and control group at birth, week 3 and 6 and calculated average daily gain from birth to week 3, week 3 to 6 and from birth to week 6.

Weight at Birth Weight at
3 weeks
Weight at
6 weeks
 

ADG
week 1-3

 

ADG
week 3-6

 

ADG
week 1-6

Test (EXT)

40.84

61.80

72.82

1.00

0.57

0.78

Control (CON) 40 57.98 71.73 0.88 0.63

0.75

  • Abnormal feces were significantly more frequent in the control group, particularly during weeks 3 and 4—time points that coincided with routine stress events like vaccination, dehorning, and relocation.

The mean number of days with diarrhea (defined as a fecal score of 1 or 2) was 3.40 ± 2.01 in CON calves and3.40 ± 2.37 in EXT calves. In a Poisson regression model, there was no significant difference in diarrhea incidence between treatment groups (IRR: 0.11; 95% CI: –0.37 to 0.60; P = 0.64), nor was birth weight associated with diarrhea occurrence (P = 0.94). However, serum IgG concentration was significantly associated with diarrhea risk: calves with serum IgG > 28 g/L had a lower incidence of diarrhea (IRR: 0.58; 95%CI: 0.35 to 0.95; P = 0.03) compared to calves with IgG < 28 g/L (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Predicted days with diarrhea over time by serum IgG from repeated measures model, controlling for treatment group and birth weight.

The mean number of days with severe diarrhea (fecal score of 2) was 1.10 ± 0.88 in CON and 0.50 ± 0.71 inEXT. In the Poisson model, controlling for IgG (P = 0.31) and birth weight (P = 0.81), treatment group tended to be associated with the outcome. Specifically, calves in EXT tended to have a lower incidence (IRR: 0.40; 95%CI: 0.14 to 1.19; P = 0.099) of severe diarrhea compared to CON (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Predicted days with severe diarrhea over time by treatment group from repeated measures model, controlling for serum IgG concentration and birth weight.

During these high-stress periods, the test group displayed notably greater resilience, with fewer clinical symptoms and better fecal consistency.

These outcomes reinforce the hypothesis that transition milk, whether naturally collected or simulated via high-quality colostrum replacers added to the liquid diet, can serve as a bridge between passive immunity and active immune development, reducing disease risk and enhancing growth even in well-managed herds.

A Healthy Calf Is Priceless

While some producers may initially view the purchase of colostrum powder as an added cost, this study highlights the clear economic and welfare returns: faster-growing calves, fewer treatments, and better health outcomes. Transition milk strategies also contribute to greater job satisfaction, as healthier calves reduce the daily burden of disease management.

As the dairy industry continues to evolve, approaches that combine science with practical application, such as the one tested at Koepon farm, represent a valuable shift toward proactive calf care. With more research and field trials confirming the benefits of extended colostrum and transition milk feeding, it’s time to recognize transition milk not as a byproduct, but as a vital resource in the development of high-performing, resilient dairy calves.

 

Data referenced in this article is currently unpublished and will be made publicly available in the near future.

Dr. Juliana Mergh Leão, DVM M Sc. D Sc. Technical Manager & RD – EU, SCCL

Dr. Dave Renaud, DVM PhD, Associate Professor, University of Guelph

Ruth Huinder, Student Hogeschool Van Hall Larenstein, SCCL Intern

The Colostrum Counsel – Ready for a Challenge? Discover How You and Your Calves Can Thrive!

Introduction

Personality traits influence dairy calves’ responses to disease, pain, and nutritional challenges. By understanding these traits and implementing effective management strategies, farmers can enhance calf welfare and reduce stress for both the animals, labor and farm owners.

Understanding Calf Personality Traits

Recent research has shown that dairy calves exhibit distinct personality traits that affect their responses to various stressors. These traits include:

  • Fearful: Calves that are more cautious and slower to approach new stimuli.
  • Active: Calves that are more energetic and exhibit higher levels of movement.
  • Explorative: Calves that are curious and interact more with their environment.

Recognizing these traits can help farmers tailor their management practices to better support individual calves.

Impact of Personality on Stress Responses

Calves routinely face stressors such as disease (e.g., diarrhea), painful procedures (e.g., dehorning), and nutritional challenges (e.g., weaning). The study found that personality traits significantly influence how calves respond to these stressors:

  • Diarrhea: Fearful calves showed greater changes in milk intake and drinking speed, while active calves exhibited changes in activity levels.
  • Dehorning: Explorative calves had less disruption in feeding behaviors and lying bouts, indicating better resilience to pain.
  • Weaning: Active calves had fewer unrewarded visits to the feeder, suggesting better adaptation to the transition from milk to solid feed.

Understanding these responses can help farmers identify calves that may need additional support during stressful periods.

Practical Implications for Farmers

By incorporating knowledge of calf personality traits into management practices, farmers can improve calf welfare and reduce stress. Here are some practical tips:

1. Tailored Feeding Plans: Adjust feeding strategies based on individual calf behaviors. For example, provide additional support to fearful calves during weaning to ensure adequate solid feed intake.

2. Pain Management: Implement comprehensive pain management protocols during procedures like dehorning. Explorative calves may benefit from additional monitoring to ensure they remain comfortable.

3. Disease Monitoring: Use precision livestock technologies to track changes in behavior and identify early signs of disease. Active calves may require closer observation during periods of illness.

4. Environmental Enrichment: Provide opportunities for calves to explore and interact with their environment. This can help reduce stress and promote positive behaviors.

Benefits of Improved Calf Management

Effective calf management not only enhances animal welfare but also offers several benefits to farmers:

  • Reduced Stress: By addressing the specific needs of individual calves, farmers can minimize stress for both the animals and themselves.
  • Improved Productivity: Healthy, well-managed calves are more likely to grow into productive adults, contributing to the overall success of the farm.
  • Enhanced Welfare: Promoting positive behaviors and reducing stressors leads to better overall welfare for the calves.

 

This summary is based on findings from the original study:

Are you ready for a challenge? Personality traits influence dairy calves’ responses to disease, pain, and nutritional challenges

M.M. Woodrum Setser, H.W. Neave, J.H.C. Costa

Journal of Dairy Science, Volume 107, Issue 11, 2024, Pages 9821-9838, ISSN 0022-0302, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-24514.

 

The Colostrum Counsel – Preventing Respiratory Disease in Calves: Why Environment and Colostrum Matter

Introduction

Respiratory disease is one of the most common and economically significant health challenges affecting preweaned dairy calves. It accounts for a substantial proportion of antibiotic treatments, veterinary costs, and calf losses on farms, and it remains a persistent barrier to achieving optimal calf health and productivity.

How common is it?

In a Canadian study involving 74 dairy farms and over 7,800 calves, nearly 30% of calves were treated at least once during the preweaning period with an antibiotic, and respiratory disease was the most frequently cited reason for treatment. Specifically, it accounted for 54% of all recorded antibiotic treatments (Uyama et al., 2022). Similarly, data from a multi-state U.S. study of more than 2,500 calves reported that one-third of calves experienced at least one health event, with respiratory signs observed in 33% of sick calves. Among those with respiratory signs, 88% received antibiotics. The same study reported an overall preweaning mortality rate of 5% percent, with respiratory disease responsible for 14% of deaths and an additional 7% involving both respiratory and digestive causes (Urie et al., 2018).

What is the impact?

Respiratory disease during the preweaning period has serious consequences for both dairy heifer performance and in calves raised for beef or veal.

A recent meta-analysis evaluated the impact of preweaning respiratory disease on dairy heifers using data from 27 studies (Buczinski et al., 2021). Heifers diagnosed with respiratory disease during the preweaning period had 3 times higher odds of dying and 2 times higher odds of being removed from the herd, either through culling, sale, or death, before first calving compared to unaffected heifers. These heifers also gained 67 grams less per day during the preweaning phase and produced 121 kilograms less milk in their first lactation. Studies included in the meta-analysis also found that respiratory disease was associated with a delay in age at first calving by 8 to 14 days and a lower likelihood of surviving through the first lactation. Together, these findings illustrate the impact of early-life respiratory disease on dairy herd productivity.

In calves raised for veal or dairy-beef, the effects are also substantial. In a study of 3,519 veal calves followed through to slaughter, a single episode of respiratory disease was associated with an average reduction of 8 kilograms in hot carcass weight, lower fat cover, and a 6 times higher risk of mortality compared to calves without respiratory disease (Pardon et al., 2013). The impact worsened with repeated illness, with calves that experienced two or three or more episodes of respiratory disease had average reductions in hot carcass weight of 22 and 42 kilograms, respectively. Multiple episodes were also linked to poorer carcass quality and an increased likelihood of undesirable red meat color at slaughter.

Whether calves are destined for the milking herd or the beef supply chain, the consequences of respiratory disease are significant, underscoring the importance of targeted prevention and strong foundational immunity to protect calf health and performance.

What are the key factors to consider with prevention?

Housing and the environment

The environment in which calves are raised has a direct influence on their respiratory health. Well-managed housing can reduce pathogen exposure and support immune function, while poor conditions can increase the risk of respiratory disease through both direct and indirect stressors.

Bedding is a critical component of the calf’s environment. As bedding accumulates manure and forms a deep, wet pack, it contributes to a higher incidence of respiratory illness in preweaned calves (Donlon et al., 2023). This is likely due to both elevated bacterial load and the accumulation of ammonia, a pollutant produced from the microbial breakdown of urea in contaminated bedding and manure. Beyond bedding, other aspects of the housing environment also play a role. Proper ventilation helps control moisture and airborne contaminants, but excessive airspeed when the calf is outside of its thermoneutral zone can lead to chilling and increased respiratory disease (Donlon et al., 2023). Additionally, providing more than 35 square feet per calf has been shown to reduce airborne bacterial concentrations, likely by improving airflow and reducing animal density (Norlund and Halbach, 2019). The influence of these factors is summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Influence of environmental and housing factors on the development of respiratory disease in calves.

Where does colostrum fit?

Colostrum, or more specifically achieving adequate passive immunity, is not always top of mind when discussing respiratory disease prevention. However, the evidence clearly shows that it plays a central role in reducing the risk of pneumonia in young calves.

A recent summary of eight studies on pneumonia in calves, most of which focused on dairy herds, found that calves with poor colostrum intake were much more likely to get respiratory disease. Specifically, the risk of respiratory disease was 1.6 times higher in calves that had failed transfer of passive immunity (Thompson and Smith, 2022). The authors estimated that 31 percent of respiratory disease cases in calves with failed transfer of passive immunity could be directly attributed to inadequate colostrum management. Looking more broadly, the median population attributable fraction was 17 percent, meaning that across an entire herd, nearly one in six pneumonia cases could be avoided by improving passive immunity in all calves, not just those at highest risk.

Recent research has also highlighted the value of achieving even higher levels of passive immunity than previously thought. Combining results from three studies representing 10,000 dairy heifers grouped by passive immunity levels (Crannell and Abuelo, 2023; Lombard et al., 2020; Sutter et al., 2023), treatment for respiratory disease occurred in 25 percent of calves with poor immunity, 18 percent with fair, 13 percent with good, and only 11 percent with excellent passive immunity. These findings show that aiming for excellent (> 25 g of IgG absorbed per L of serum), not just adequate, colostrum transfer can make a meaningful difference in preventing respiratory disease.

This protection is likely due to immunoglobulin G, the dominant antibody in colostrum. Once absorbed, IgG circulates in the blood, neutralizing pathogens and supporting the early immune response. In addition to its systemic role, IgG can also be transported back into mucosal surfaces, including the respiratory tract, where it helps block pathogens at the site of infection. Figure 2 highlights how IgG protects against respiratory disease. Colostrum also contains other immune-supporting compounds, like lactoferrin, cytokines, and growth factors, that further enhance early immune development and resilience against disease.

Figure 2. Pathway of how colostrum supports the prevention of respiratory disease.

Take Home Messages

Preventing respiratory disease in calves requires attention to both the environment and early-life care. Clean, dry bedding, good ventilation, and enough space help reduce exposure to airborne pathogens. Just as important, feeding high-quality colostrum soon after birth gives calves the protection they need to stay healthy. Together, these practices lower disease risk, reduce treatment needs, and support better long-term outcomes.

 

Dave Renaud DVM PhD, Associate Professor, University of Guelph

 

References

Buczinski S, Achard D, Timsit E. Effects of calfhood respiratory disease on health and performance of dairy cattle: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science. 2021 Jul 1;104(7):8214-27.

Crannell P, Abuelo A. Comparison of calf morbidity, mortality, and future performance across categories of passive immunity: A retrospective cohort study in a dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science. 2023 Apr 1;106(4):2729-38.

Donlon JD, McAloon CG, Hyde R, Aly S, Pardon B, Mee JF. A systematic review of the relationship between housing environmental factors and bovine respiratory disease in preweaned calves-Part 2: Temperature, relative humidity and bedding. The Veterinary Journal. 2023 Oct 1;300:106032.

Lombard J, Urie N, Garry F, Godden S, Quigley J, Earleywine T, McGuirk S, Moore D, Branan M, Chamorro M, Smith G. Consensus recommendations on calf-and herd-level passive immunity in dairy calves in the United States. Journal of dairy science. 2020 Aug 1;103(8):7611-24.

Nordlund KV, Halbach CE. Calf barn design to optimize health and ease of management. Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice. 2019 Mar 1;35(1):29-45.

Pardon B, Hostens M, Duchateau L, Dewulf J, De Bleecker K, Deprez P. Impact of respiratory disease, diarrhea, otitis and arthritis on mortality and carcass traits in white veal calves. BMC Veterinary Research. 2013 Dec;9:1-4.

Raboisson D, Trillat P, Cahuzac C. Failure of passive immune transfer in calves: A meta-analysis on the consequences and assessment of the economic impact. PloS one. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0150452.

Sutter F, Venjakob PL, Heuwieser W, Borchardt S. Association between transfer of passive immunity, health, and performance of female dairy calves from birth to weaning. Journal of Dairy Science. 2023 Oct 1;106(10):7043-55.

Thompson AC, Smith DR. Failed transfer of passive immunity is a component cause of pre-weaning disease in beef and dairy calves: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Bovine Practitioner. 2022 Dec 29;56(2):47-61.

Urie NJ, Lombard JE, Shivley CB, Kopral CA, Adams AE, Earleywine TJ, Olson JD, Garry FB. Preweaned heifer management on US dairy operations: Part V. Factors associated with morbidity and mortality in preweaned dairy heifer calves. Journal of dairy science. 2018 Oct 1;101(10):9229-44.

Uyama T, Renaud DL, Morrison EI, McClure JT, LeBlanc SJ, Winder CB, de Jong E, McCubbin KD, Barkema HW, Dufour S, Sanchez J. Associations of calf management practices with antimicrobial use in Canadian dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science. 2022 Nov 1;105(11):9084-97.

The Colostrum Counsel – Beef Calves Start Strong with Colostrum

With calving in full swing and Mother Nature throwing some curve balls, ensuring newborn calves receive high-quality colostrum is more critical than ever.

Introduction

Colostrum, the first milk produced by the dam, is rich in immunoglobulins (antibodies), essential nutrients, and bioactive components that are vital for the health and survival of neonatal calves. The timely intake of adequate colostrum is crucial for passive immunity transfer, protecting calves from diseases and setting the foundation for robust growth and development.

The Importance of Colostrum in Beef Calves

Newborn calves are born without a fully developed immune system, making them susceptible to various pathogens. Colostrum provides the necessary antibodies, primarily Immunoglobulin G (IgG), to safeguard against infections during the early stages of life. Research indicates that calves require approximately 300 grams of immunoglobulins (IgG) within the first day of life to achieve excellent passive transfer. The absorption of these IgGs is highest in the first 2 hrs of life. Producers should be aware of this and strive to ensure calves are receiving colostrum from the dam or as a supplement/ replacer in a timely fashion. Beyond immunoglobulins, colostrum contains elevated levels of fat, protein, vitamins (such as A, D, and E), and minerals compared to regular milk. These nutrients are essential for jumpstarting the calf’s metabolism, stimulating digestive activity, and supporting overall vitality.

Dr. Lisa Gamsjäger’s Research Findings

Dr. Lisa Gamsjäger, a researcher specializing in pre-weaning ruminant health, has focused her studies on the transfer of passive immunity and neonatal vaccine strategies. Her work emphasizes the critical role of colostrum not only in providing antibodies but also in delivering growth factors and bioactive components that influence gut health and metabolic programming. Dr. Gamsjäger’s research suggests that even when calves receive sufficient antibodies to prevent clinical Failure of Passive Transfer (FPT), inadequate intake of these additional colostral components can lead to suboptimal growth and increased susceptibility to stressors such as weaning and transportation.

In a collaborative study, Dr. Gamsjäger and her colleagues investigated the impact of colostrum management on beef calves. The findings highlighted that calves receiving high-quality colostrum shortly after birth exhibited improved health outcomes and reduced incidence of diseases. This underscores the necessity for beef producers to adopt effective colostrum management practices to enhance calf performance and welfare.

Challenges in Colostrum Management for Beef Producers

Unlike dairy operations, where colostrum quality can be directly measured using tools like Brix refractometry, beef producers often lack the means to assess colostrum quality on-farm.

Therefore, implementing best management practices is essential to ensure calves receive adequate and high-quality colostrum. Factors to consider include:

  • Dam Nutrition and Health: Proper nutrition and health of the dam during gestation significantly influence colostrum quality and yield.
  • Timely Intervention: Calves should ingest colostrum as soon as possible, preferably within the first two hours post-birth, to maximize antibody absorption.
  • Environmental Conditions: Adverse weather, muddy environments, and stress can hinder a calf’s ability to nurse effectively, necessitating manual colostrum administration.

 

Decision Process for Colostrum Supplementation or Replacement

To assist producers in making informed decisions regarding colostrum supplementation or replacement, the following protocol is recommended:

  • Birth Intervention Assessment:
    • No Assistance or Minor Difficulty: Monitor to ensure the calf stands and nurses within two hours.
    • Major Difficulty, C-Section, or Abnormal Presentation: High risk for FPT; consider immediate colostrum supplementation or replacement.
    • Dam-related Issues (e.g., death, poor udder conformation, inadequate bonding) or Weak Calf: Provide full colostrum replacement promptly.
  • Initial Monitoring (0-2 Hours Post-Birth):
    • Calf Standing and Nursing Vigorously: No intervention needed; continue to monitor.
    • Calf Not Standing, Lacks Suckle Reflex, or in Adverse Conditions (e.g., mud, twin birth): Administer colostrum replacement immediately.
    • Calf Attempting but Failing to Nurse Successfully: Provide an appropriate dose of colostrum supplement.
  • Follow-Up Monitoring (6-12 Hours Post-Birth):
    • Calf Nursing and Bonded with Dam: Continue regular monitoring.
    • Calf Not Nursing: Administer a second feeding of colostrum supplement or replacement as necessary.
    • Assess Additional Needs: Determine further colostrum requirements based on the calf’s size and health status.

 

By adhering to this structured colostrum management protocol and incorporating insights from recent research, producers can enhance calf immunity, reduce disease incidence, and promote optimal growth and development. Proactive colostrum management is a pivotal investment in the long-term productivity and profitability of beef operations.

Dr. Travis White

SCCL, Director of Veterinary Technical Services

The Colostrum Counsel – The Critical Role of Passive Immunity in Calf Health and Development

Introduction

Newborn calves have an underdeveloped immune system and no circulating maternal antibodies, leaving them highly susceptible to infectious diseases. Unlike humans, where passive immunity is transferred through the placenta, the synepitheliochorial placenta of cattle prevents the transfer of immunoglobulins from the dam to the fetus (Peter, 2013). As a result, calves are born without humoral immunity and rely entirely on colostrum intake for passive immunity.

Immunoglobulins and their role in calf immunity

At birth, calves are assumed to absorb immunoglobulins from colostrum through pinocytosis (Stott et al., 1979) (Figure 1). However, intestinal permeability declines rapidly, with a significant reduction in immunoglobulin absorption after 12 hours (Stott et al., 1979b; Bush and Staley, 1980). The exact mechanism behind this decline is unclear, but it is thought to result from the depletion of pinocytotic activity or the replacement of enterocytes with mature epithelial cells (Broughton and Lecce, 1970; Smeaton and Simpson-Morgan, 1985; Weaver et al., 2000).

Figure 1. Process of immunoglobulin absorption through pinocytosis in the intestinal cell.

What immunoglobulin?

Although colostrum contains other immunoglobulins, such as IgM and IgA, IgG is the predominant antibody (Figure 2) and the primary focus of research due to its central role in passive immunity. Once absorbed, IgG neutralizes pathogens, enhances opsonization, and supports adaptive immune development (Janeway et al., 2001). Additionally, IgG can be re-secreted into the intestine, contributing to mucosal immunity alongside IgA (Besser et al., 1988; Ulfman et al., 2018) (as shown in Figure 1)

 

 

Figure 2. Postparturient colostral IgG, IgA, and IgM concentrations for 6 milkings after calving at 12 hours intervals. Data from Stott et al. (1981).

Effects of passive immunity

Short-term effects

Failure of transfer of passive immunity (FTPI) is typically defined as serum IgG < 10 g/L in a calf at 24 to 36 hours of age (Weaver et al., 2000). Using this threshold, Raboisson et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis of 10 studies and found that dairy calves with FTPI had:

  1. 2.12 times higher risk of mortality
  2. 1.75 times higher risk of respiratory disease
  3. 1.51 times higher risk of diarrhea
  4. 1.91 times higher risk of overall morbidity
  5. 81 g/day lower average daily gain

 

Cumulatively, based on the study results, the estimated economic impact of FTPI was found to be $89.27 CAD per case. Similarly, Abdallah et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis on non-replacement dairy calves (veal or dairy-beef) using the same FTPI threshold (< 10 g IgG/L) and found that affected calves had:

  1. 2.46 times higher odds of mortality
  2. 3.03 times higher odds of diarrhea

More recent research suggests that higher thresholds should be used to define adequate passive immunity. Lombard et al. (2020), through expert consensus, concluded that the traditional 10 g/L cutoff is too low and that achieving higher serum IgG levels is critical for optimal calf health. The recommended thresholds for serum IgG concentrations, total protein, and Brix % are outlined in Table 1.

 

Table 1. Consensus serum IgG concentrations, total protein, and Brix %, along with the suggested targets by Lombard et al. (2020).

Multiple studies have confirmed the benefits of achieving higher passive immunity thresholds. Sutter et al. (2023) analyzed serum total protein data from 3,434 dairy calves sampled between 2 to 7 days of age on a commercial dairy farm. They found that calves with excellent passive immunity (vs. poor) had:

  1. 50% lower hazard for respiratory disease
  2. 50% lower hazard for overall morbidity
  3. 60% lower hazard for mortality
  4. 0.04 kg/day higher average daily gain

 

Crannell and Abuelo (2023), also had similar findings. Analyzing serum total protein records from 4,336 dairy calves sampled between 2 to 7 days of age on a commercial dairy farm, they reported that calves with excellent passive immunity (vs. poor) had:

  1. 33% lower hazard for diarrhea
  2. 28% lower hazard for respiratory disease
  3. 34% lower hazard for overall morbidity
  4. 77% lower hazard for mortality

 

Long-term effects

Few studies have examined the long-term impacts of passive immunity. DeNise et al. (1989) analyzed serum IgG levels in 1,000 calves sampled between 24 to 48 hours of age and found that for every 1 g/L increase in IgG, first-lactation milk yield increased by 8.5 kg. Additionally, calves with IgG < 12 g/L had the highest rates of culling for low production in their first lactation and increased mortality from birth to 180 days.

More recently, Crannell and Abuelo (2023) applied the Lombard et al. (2020) passive immunity thresholds and found that calves in the excellent category (vs. poor) had:

  1. 2.78 times higher hazard of being inseminated
  2. 2.22 times higher hazard of becoming pregnant as a heifer
  3. 1.32 times higher hazard of calving for the first time

 

Similarly, Faber et al. (2005), although not directly measuring IgG, reported that calves fed 4 L of colostrum at birth produced 955 kg more milk in their first lactation and 1,652 kg more in their second lactation compared to those receiving 2 L of colostrum.

Going beyond passive immunity

Although IgG and passive immunity have been the primary focus, colostrum contains a variety of bioactive compounds that influence immune system development and gut health (Blum and Hammon, 2000; Fischer-Tlustos et al., 2021). Feeding colostrum soon after birth supports early microbial colonization, promoting beneficial bacteria while reducing potential pathogens (Malmuthuge et al., 2015). Additionally, Fischer-Tlustos et al. (2020) reported that earlier colostrum intake improved villi height and crypt depth, increasing the surface area for nutrient absorption. While IgG is often emphasized, its benefits may be closely linked to other bioactive components that contribute to overall calf health.

Take away messages

Colostrum is essential for calf immunity, as newborns are born without maternal antibodies and rely entirely on passive transfer for protection. Because IgG absorption declines rapidly, with significantly reduced permeability after 12 hours, timely colostrum feeding is critical. Higher passive immunity improves short-term health by reducing the risk of mortality, respiratory disease, and diarrhea while also enhancing growth. Long-term benefits include improved first-lactation milk yield, lower culling rates, and better reproductive performance. Recent research suggests that the traditional 10 g/L IgG threshold is too low, and achieving higher passive immunity levels is necessary for optimal health and productivity. Ensuring calves receive a sufficient quantity of high-quality colostrum immediately after birth is essential for their health, growth, and long-term success.

Dave Renaud, DVM PhD, Associate Professor, University of Guelph

 

References

Abdallah A, Francoz D, Berman J, Dufour S, Buczinski S. Association between transfer of passive immunity and health disorders in multisource commingled dairy calves raised for veal or other purposes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science. 2022 Oct 1;105(10):8371-86.

Besser TE, Gay CC, McGUIRE TC, Evermann JF. Passive immunity to bovine rotavirus infection associated with transfer of serum antibody into the intestinal lumen. Journal of Virology. 1988 Jul;62(7):2238-42.

Blum JW, Hammon H. Colostrum effects on the gastrointestinal tract, and on nutritional, endocrine and metabolic parameters in neonatal calves. Livestock Production Science. 2000 Oct 1;66(2):151-9.

Crannell P, Abuelo A. Comparison of calf morb

DeNise SK, Robison JD, Stott GH, Armstrong DV. Effects of passive immunity on subsequent production in dairy heifers. Journal of dairy science. 1989 Feb 1;72(2):552-4.

Faber SN, Faber NE, McCauley TC, Ax RL. Case study: effects of colostrum ingestion on lactational performance 1. The professional animal scientist. 2005 Oct 1;21(5):420-5.

Fischer-Tlustos AJ, Lopez A, Hare KS, Wood KM, Steele MA. Effects of colostrum management on transfer of passive immunity and the potential role of colostral bioactive components on neonatal calf development and metabolism. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2021 Feb 24;101(3):405-26.

Janeway Jr CA, Travers P, Walport M, Shlomchik MJ. The distribution and functions of immunoglobulin isotypes. InImmunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease. 5th edition 2001. Garland Science.

Lombard J, Urie N, Garry F, Godden S, Quigley J, Earleywine T, McGuirk S, Moore D, Branan M, Chamorro M, Smith G. Consensus recommendations on calf-and herd-level passive immunity in dairy calves in the United States. Journal of dairy science. 2020 Aug 1;103(8):7611-24.

Malmuthuge N, Chen Y, Liang G, Goonewardene LA. Heat-treated colostrum feeding promotes beneficial bacteria colonization in the small intestine of neonatal calves. Journal of dairy science. 2015 Nov 1;98(11):8044-53.

Peter AT. Bovine placenta: a review on morphology, components, and defects from terminology and clinical perspectives. Theriogenology. 2013 Oct 15;80(7):693-705.

Raboisson D, Trillat P, Cahuzac C. Failure of passive immune transfer in calves: A meta-analysis on the consequences and assessment of the economic impact. PloS one. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0150452.

Stott GH, Marx DB, Menefee BE, Nightengale GT. Colostral immunoglobulin transfer in calves I. Period of absorption. Journal of dairy science. 1979 Oct 1;62(10):1632-8.

Stott GH, Fleenor WA, Kleese WC. Colostral immunoglobulin concentration in two fractions of first milking postpartum and five additional milkings. Journal of dairy science. 1981 Mar 1;64(3):459-65.

Sutter F, Venjakob PL, Heuwieser W, Borchardt S. Association between transfer of passive immunity, health, and performance of female dairy calves from birth to weaning. Journal of Dairy Science. 2023 Oct 1;106(10):7043-55.

Ulfman LH, Leusen JH, Savelkoul HF, Warner JO, Van Neerven RJ. Effects of bovine immunoglobulins on immune function, allergy, and infection. Frontiers in nutrition. 2018 Jun 22;5:52.

Weaver DM, Tyler JW, VanMetre DC, Hostetler DE, Barrington GM. Passive transfer of colostral immunoglobulins in calves. Journal of veterinary internal medicine. 2000 Nov;14(6):569-77.

.

The Colostrum Counsel – Improving The Quality Of Maternal Colostrum Through Supplementation With A Colostrum Replacer

Introduction

Colostrum, rich in nutrients and antibodies, is essential for providing passive immunity to newborn calves. The concentration of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) in colostrum is a key factor in determining its quality, and Brix refractometry is commonly used on farms as an indirect measure of IgG concentration in colostrum. Feeding calves with high-quality colostrum during the first hours of life is crucial for ensuring adequate IgG transfer, as calves strictly rely on it to develop disease resistance (Figure 1). However, the quality of maternal colostrum can vary significantly among cows within the same herd. In this context, enriching maternal colostrum with a colostrum replacer has emerged as an effective strategy to improve quality by increasing levels of IgG, nutrients, and bioactive compounds.

Figure 1. Graphical representation of the transfer of passive immunity mechanism in newborn calves.

 

Brix % and variability of maternal colostrum

For colostrum to be considered high quality, it must have an IgG concentration greater than 50 g/L (McGuirk and Collins, 2004). A practical, quick, and cost-effective way to measure colostrum quality on the farm is through the use of a refractometer (Bielmann et al., 2010). Instead of directly measuring IgG concentration, the refractometer assesses the total protein content of colostrum, providing results expressed in % Brix. The correlation between % Brix and IgG concentration in colostrum is quite high, especially in the first hours after calving (Quigley et al., 2013). Research has shown that a Brix of 22% or higher generally indicates good quality colostrum, with an adequate amount of IgG to ensure passive transfer of immunity (Quigley et al., 2013) and guarantee optimal calf health. In this regard, if a person were to feed a 40 kg calf 4 liters of a 22% Brix colostrum, they would be providing 200 grams of IgG.
 
This has been a general guideline for many years for a Holstein calf, which should receive 10% of its body weight (.1 X 40 = 4L) at 22% Brix (50 g IgG/L x 4 = 200 grams of IgG). However, new recommendations indicate that calf morbidity and the rate of failed passive transfer decrease when more antibodies (IgG) are provided in the colostrum. These new recommendations now suggest providing 300 grams of IgG to achieve excellent passive transfer. What does this mean in terms of Brix? It means that we need to raise the standards on the farm to select colostrum with Brix levels higher than 24%. However, ensuring consistent colostrum quality in a herd is very difficult, as there are conditions that cause significant variability among cows in the same herd. This variability is influenced by factors such as age, breed, nutrition, prepartum vaccinations, milk production, and the interval between calving and colostrum collection, among others (Moore et al., 2005; Conneely et al., 2013). In a study conducted in 8 dairy farms in the United States (Figure 2), which analyzed IgG concentration in maternal colostrum through refractometry, Brix percentages ranged from 12% to 32%, with an average of 23.8%, indicating the vast variability in IgG concentration among cows (Quigley et al., 2013). This study by Quigley et al. (2013) highlights the challenge of relying exclusively on maternal colostrum to ensure adequate quality and, therefore, correct passive transfer of IgG in calves.
 
 

Figure 2. Adapted from Quigley et al. (2013). Distribution of total protein in maternal colostrum estimated through Brix refractometry

 
To address this variability and improve the quality of maternal colostrum, an effective strategy is the enrichment with a colostrum replacer. This strategy presents itself as a viable alternative to overcome the limitations associated with differences in the quality of maternal colostrum available on the farm, thus ensuring greater consistency in the transfer of essential antibodies for the immune development of the calves.
 
 
Benefits of enriching low – quality maternal colostrum
 
The enrichment process involves adding a precise amount of colostrum replacer directly to the maternal colostrum. This way, if the maternal colostrum has a low Brix percentage, for example between 15% and 24%, and we want to increase it to higher quality percentages, we can enrich it with a colostrum replacer that has a consistent IgG level. When and why should we consider enriching maternal colostrum?

 

  1. To increase the immunological quality of the maternal colostrum.
  2. To decrease variability in colostrum quality within the herd.
  3. In cases of delayed colostrum milking. To provide broad protection against pathogens.
  4. To improve thermoregulation in calves in extreme cold or hot climate conditions.
  5. When calves:
    • Are born to first-time heifers.
    • Are born to cows with poor nutrition.
    • Are small, with low birth weight.
  6. In cases of dystocia (C-section) due to decreased apparent efficiency of IgG absorption (Murray et al., 2015).
  7. In high genetic value calves.
 
 
There is scientific evidence supporting the usefulness of enriching maternal colostrum. In a study conducted in Canada, researchers investigated whether low-quality maternal colostrum could be enriched with bovine colostrum replacer to reach adequate serum IgG levels in newborn calves (Lopez et al., 2023).
In this study, the researchers fed the calves maternal colostrum with a Brix content of 15.8% (equivalent to 30 g/L of IgG), achieving an average serum IgG concentration of 11.76 g/L (Figure 3). This IgG concentration falls within the “fair” category on the most recent passive transfer of immunity classification scale (Lombard et al., 2020). The maternal colostrum was then supplemented with 551 g of colostrum replacer (Saskatoon, SK, Canada; SCCL) to bring the IgG concentration up to 60 g/L. Calves that were fed the combination of maternal colostrum + colostrum replacer had an average serum IgG concentration of 19.85 g/L, thus moving from the “fair” to the “good” category on the passive transfer of immunity scale of Lombard et al. (2020). Furthermore, 18.8% of the calves fed maternal colostrum with 15.8% Brix experienced failure in the transfer of passive immunity. However, when that colostrum was enriched with colostrum replacer, 0% of the calves showed failed passive immunity (Lopez et al., 2023). In another similar study conducted in Brazil, calves were fed maternal colostrum with 25% Brix or maternal colostrum that initially had 20% Brix but was enriched to 25% Brix using a colostrum replacer (Saskatoon, SK, Canada; SCCL) (Silva et al., 2024).
The final results of this study found no differences between the calves regarding serum IgG concentration, total serum protein, apparent efficiency of IgG absorption, concentrate intake, daily weight gain, body weight, or variables related to the health status of the calves.

Figure 3. Modified from Lopez et al. (2023).

These results demonstrate that improving the quality of maternal colostrum through enrichment with a colostrum replacer is possible, as evidenced by the lack of differences in serum IgG levels, health status, and productivity in the calves across both treatments. At SCCL, there are a series of recommendations for enriching colostrum on the farm. It is considered that any colostrum with a Brix percentage of 22% or lower should be enriched to achieve an adequate IgG mass. Table 1 shows the classification of colostrum based on its Brix percentage and the corresponding recommendation.

Table 1. Recommendations for enriching maternal colostrum with a colostrum replacer.

To know exactly how much colostrum replacer we need to add to our maternal colostrum, we first need to determine the Brix percentage of the colostrum we are working with. This can be done using a refractometer, which will quickly provide us with a reading based on the quality of our colostrum. Additionally, we need to set the target Brix percentage we want to achieve with the enrichment. Our goal should always be to obtain colostrum that falls between 25-30% Brix. Once we know the Brix percentage of our colostrum (what we have) and our enrichment goal (what we want to reach), we can use Table 2 as a reference to determine how many grams of SCCL colostrum replacer we need to add to our maternal colostrum.
 

Table 2. Colostrum powder calculations to enrich fresh colostrum.

 
Don’t neglect the fundamentals of proper colostrum management.
 
 
Enriching low-quality maternal colostrum is a practical and effective tool that ensures an optimal and uniform start for all newborn calves. However, to achieve ideal results, it’s important not to forget that proper colostrum management generally involves applying a protocol with an emphasis on four main points (Figure 4).

 

  1. Timing of administration → within the first 2 hours, with a second feeding within the first 12 hours.
  2. Colostrum quality → IgG concentration above 50 g/L.
  3. Colostrum quantity → a first feeding equivalent to 10% of body weight in kg + a second feeding equivalent to 5% of body weight.
  4. Colostrum cleanliness → low pathogen load or bacterial counts.
 
Finally, it is essential that when enriching colostrum, a colostrum replacer derived directly from maternal colostrum is used. This ensures that the product retains the essential characteristics of natural colostrum, without the addition of additives or the removal of crucial components. An appropriate replacer should maintain the natural levels of fat, protein, immunoglobulins, and bioactive compounds present in maternal colostrum. In this way, it ensures that the calves receive nutrition and immune protection like what they would obtain from natural maternal colostrum, maximizing the benefits for their health and development.

Figure 4. Key points of an adequate colostrum management protocol.

Conclusion
 
The significant variability in colostrum quality among cows within the same farm makes it difficult to rely exclusively on farm colostrum for calf nutrition. Enriching with colostrum replacer is a proven method to improve IgG and nutrient content in maternal colostrum, ensuring more consistent and higher-quality colostrum. By improving colostrum quality, farmers can enhance the passive transfer of immunity, reduce disease incidence, and decrease morbidity and mortality rates. Calves that receive enriched colostrum are better prepared to fight infections, require fewer antibiotics, and have higher survival rates. Investing in colostrum replacer products not only promotes calf health but also reduces veterinary costs and improves long-term production, contributing to the development of more sustainable dairy industries.
 
 
References
 
Bielmann, V., J. Gillan, N.R. Perkins, A.L. Skidmore, S. Godden, and K.E. Leslie. 2010. An evaluation of Brix refractometry instruments for measurement of colostrum quality in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 93:3713–3721. doi:10.3168/JDS.2009-2943.
 
Conneely, M., D.P. Berry, R. Sayers, J.P. Murphy, I. Lorenz, M.L. Doherty, and E. Kennedy. 2013. Factors associated with the concentration of immunoglobulin G in the colostrum of dairy cows. Animal 7:1824–1832. doi:10.1017/S1751731113001444.
 
Faber, S.N., N.E. Faber, T.C. Mccauley, and R.L. Ax. 2005. Case Study: Effects Of Colostrum Ingestion on Lactational Performance. Prof Anim Sci 21:420–425. doi:10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31240-7.
 
Lombard, J., N. Urie, F. Garry, S. Godden, J. Quigley, T. Earleywine, S. McGuirk, D. Moore, M. Branan, M. Chamorro, G. Smith, C. Shivley, D. Catherman, D. Haines, A.J. Heinrichs, R. James, J. Maas, and K. Sterner. 2020. Consensus recommendations on calf- and herd-level passive immunity in dairy calves in the United States. J Dairy Sci 103:7611–7624. doi:10.3168/JDS.2019-17955.
 
Lopez, A.J., J. Echeverry-Munera, H. McCarthy, A.C. Welboren, A. Pineda, M. Nagorske, D.L. Renaud, and M.A. Steele. 2023. Effects of enriching IgG concentration in low- and medium-quality colostrum with colostrum replacer on IgG absorption in newborn Holstein calves. J Dairy Sci 106:3680–3691. doi:10.3168/JDS.2022-22518.
 
McGuirk, S.M., and M. Collins. 2004. Managing the production, storage, and delivery of colostrum. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 20:593–603. doi:10.1016/J.CVFA.2004.06.005.
 
Moore, M., J.W. Tyler, M. Chigerwe, M.E. Dawes, and J.R. Middleton. 2005. Effect of delayed colostrum collection on colostral IgG concentration in dairy cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 226:1375–1377. doi:10.2460/JAVMA.2005.226.1375.
 
Murray, C.F., D.M. Veira, A.L. Nadalin, D.M. Haines, M.L. Jackson, D.L. Pearl, and K.E. Leslie. 2015. The effect of dystocia on physiological and behavioral characteristics related to vitality and passive transfer of immunoglobulins in newborn Holstein calves. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 79:109.
 
Quigley, J.D., A. Lago, C. Chapman, P. Erickson, and J. Polo. 2013. Evaluation of the Brix refractometer to estimate immunoglobulin G concentration in bovine colostrum. J Dairy Sci 96:1148–1155. doi:10.3168/JDS.2012-5823.
 
Robison, J.D., G.H. Stott, and S.K. DeNise. 1988. Effects of passive immunity on growth and survival in the dairy heifer. J Dairy Sci 71:1283–1287. doi:10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(88)79684-8.
 
Silva, A.P., A.M. Cezar, A.F. de Toledo, M.G. Coelho, C.R. Tomaluski, G.F. Virgínio Júnior, and C.M.M. Bittar. 2024. Enrichment of medium-quality colostrum by adding colostrum replacer, combined or not with transition milk in the feeding of dairy calves. Sci Rep 14. doi:10.1038/S41598-024-55757-4.
 
 
____________________________________________

 

Lucía Pisoni, Juliana Mergh Leão, José María Rodríguez, Isela Ceballos, and Marina Godoy

Department of Clinical Research, The Saskatoon Colostrum Company Ltd., Saskatoon, Canada  

 

JOIN US!

Cooling the calf: Colostrum and transition milk solutions for heat stress

-June 25th, 2025  |  5:00 pm CST

Online zoom webinar